SMRs and AMRs

Friday, February 17, 2012

Catholic hypocrisy at its worst

Bishops condone much more direct contradictions of church dogma. The birth control uproar is a cynical power play

By Gene Lyons
Salon.com

For the record, the priest who married my wife and me in 1967 advised us that we could in good faith practice birth control. He reasoned that as Pope Paul VI was then preparing an encyclical regarding faith and sexuality, young Catholics could reasonably assume that church dogma regarding contraception would soon change to reflect contemporary realities: specifically that a couple intending to bring children into their marriage might legitimately seek to do so in their own time.

A university chaplain, he no doubt understood how the combination of Rome’s authoritarianism and theological nit-picking tended to drive educated young people from the church. Anyway, everybody knows how that worked out. Next came Humanae Vitae, Pope Paul VI’s 1968 doubling down on the church’s blanket condemnation of artificial means of birth control — a blast from the medieval past as most American Catholics now see it.

“Vatican Roulette,” we called it, and like the vast majority, declined to play. Surveys have shown that approximately 13 percent of the faithful agree with the Roman Catholic Church’s categorical ban on birth control; a mere 2 percent actually practice what the bishops preach. For most, it isn’t a serious personal issue. Sure, Your Grace, whatever.

(More here.)

1 Comments:

Blogger Tom Koch said...

The author makes a number of valid points about the Catholic Church, too bad he stopped short in asking the government to stay out of the Church, our bedrooms and our pockets.

11:17 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home