Climate change is settled science, but the skeptics are still alive and well
Krauthammer misleads on global warming
By Stephen Stromberg, Updated: February 21 at 1:16 pm Washington Post
Charles Krauthammer is right about one thing in his misleading column on global warming: Good science is dynamic, even ruthless. So is Krauthammer’s prose, but in a way that obscures and confuses more than it reveals.
Scientists continually update their understanding of the universe. New observations discredit old theories. It’s not a field for sentimentalists or ideologues. And it’s wrong to behave as though scientific holdings are impervious to improvement, whether quantum field theory or climate change. So, Krauthammer says, science, even climate science, is never “settled.”
Well, fine, but that unspectacular semantic point doesn’t lead to the conclusion Krauthammer goads the reader to reach: That high concern over climate change, with its attendant policy implications, is secular religion posing in the garb of science, worthy of contempt and dismissal.
(Continued here.)
By Stephen Stromberg, Updated: February 21 at 1:16 pm Washington Post
Charles Krauthammer is right about one thing in his misleading column on global warming: Good science is dynamic, even ruthless. So is Krauthammer’s prose, but in a way that obscures and confuses more than it reveals.
Scientists continually update their understanding of the universe. New observations discredit old theories. It’s not a field for sentimentalists or ideologues. And it’s wrong to behave as though scientific holdings are impervious to improvement, whether quantum field theory or climate change. So, Krauthammer says, science, even climate science, is never “settled.”
Well, fine, but that unspectacular semantic point doesn’t lead to the conclusion Krauthammer goads the reader to reach: That high concern over climate change, with its attendant policy implications, is secular religion posing in the garb of science, worthy of contempt and dismissal.
(Continued here.)
Powered by Blogger
1 Comments:
Krauthammer doesn't mislead. The bed-wetting proponents of global warming, er climate change, mislead.
Their models are flawed, their data fudged, the predictions empty, and yet they are arrogant enough to believe that legislation can control the climate. If that were the case, why doesn't Obama just issue an executive order forcing the climate to comply to his wishes or forcing the oceans to fall rather than rise? Why wait for legislation, just issue the edict and - voila - the earth is saved, humanity is saved. And the bed-wetters can go find another cause to latch on to in order to save humanity.
the most dangerous people in the world are those who believe their self-annointed divinity to 'save humanity'. Those people are the Changers who pontificate doom and gloom 100 years hence, but are afraid to predict what will happen in 2020 knowing that if the prediction is made while they are still alive and doesn't come true, we can see them for the frauds they truly are. So, better to make predictions hundreds of years away when their credibility cannot be judged. then they tell us 'oh, you just don't know the difference between weather and climate'. That's a gas that makes me laugh the hardest!
Luckily, there are people like me smart enough to see through the bed-wetter's crap and truly educate people that the climate change proponents - Changers, I call them - are charlatans and liars and should never, ever be trusted with saving humanity and that the planet and humanity will be just fine and adapt as it has been adapting for millions of years.
Humanity will be just fine. The planet will be just fine. There is no climate crisis and the Earth is not running a fever. The only ones running a fever are the climate change bed-wetters who stay up late at night with a box of kleenex and a flashlight worrying that someone is running a gas-powered snow blower because they believe in their own divinity for saving humanity.
Post a Comment
<< Home