SMRs and AMRs

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

A totally renewable future: Is it possible?

(LP note: The article below is nearly a year and a half old. The goals it presents are ambitious but, as the authors argue, reachable. Do our collective governments have the political wisdom to pull it off? The answer depends upon whether you are an optimist or a pessimist.)

A Plan to Power 100 Percent of the Planet with Renewables

Wind, water and solar technologies can provide 100 percent of the world's energy, eliminating all fossil fuels. Here's how.

By Mark Z. Jacobson and Mark A. Delucchi
Scientific American  | Monday, October 26, 2009 | 166

Mark Z. Jacobson is professor of civil and environmental engineering at Stanford University and director of the Atmosphere/Energy Program there. Mark A. Delucchi is a research scientist at the Institute of Transportation Studies at the University of California, Davis.

In December leaders from around the world will meet in Copenhagen to try to agree on cutting back greenhouse gas emissions for decades to come. The most effective step to implement that goal would be a massive shift away from fossil fuels to clean, renewable energy sources. If leaders can have confidence that such a transformation is possible, they might commit to an historic agreement. We think they can.
A year ago former vice president Al Gore threw down a gauntlet: to repower America with 100 percent carbon-free electricity within 10 years. As the two of us started to evaluate the feasibility of such a change, we took on an even larger challenge: to determine how 100 percent of the world’s energy, for all purposes, could be supplied by wind, water and solar resources, by as early as 2030. Our plan is presented here.

Scientists have been building to this moment for at least a decade, analyzing various pieces of the challenge. Most recently, a 2009 Stanford University study ranked energy systems according to their impacts on global warming, pollution, water supply, land use, wildlife and other concerns. The very best options were wind, solar, geothermal, tidal and hydroelectric power—all of which are driven by wind, water or sunlight (referred to as WWS). Nuclear power, coal with carbon capture, and ethanol were all poorer options, as were oil and natural gas. The study also found that battery-electric vehicles and hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles recharged by WWS options would largely eliminate pollution from the transportation sector.

(Continued here.)

Labels: ,

1 Comments:

Blogger Patrick Dempsey said...

let's take away all subsidies for renewable energy except for depreciation (which isn't really a subsidy) and let's see how well renewables compete against oil, coal, natural gas.

The dirty little secret is renewables don't stand a chance unless massively subsidized by the government.

2:48 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home