Mike Lux: Deficit Hawks Think Punishing Us Is A Peachy Way to Shrink The Deficit. Of Course They Do!
By Susie Madrak
CrooksandLiars
It's crazy, isn't it? It happens like clockwork the minute a Democrat's in the White House. Mike Lux on the Democratic deficit talk that's all the rage these days (as pointed out by Atrios the other day). Which once again raises the question: What, exactly, do Democrats stand for?
So just to summarize here: the deficit is caused by tax cuts for the rich, an economic collapse caused by wealthy bankers which resulted in bailouts for those wealthy bankers plus massive pain for middle income and poor people, tax loopholes and corporate subsidies designed to help the wealthy, plus two wars and wasteful defense spending (much of which goes into the pockets of wealthy defense contractors). And the solution for the deficit hawks: target middle class and lower seniors for social security cuts, and put in a regressive tax that is a burden to low and middle income people.
Justice: American style.(Continued here.)
Elites are selling this as a grand compromise: Conservatives get Social Security cuts, and liberals get a tax increase. Oh, boy. My question is: what do regular folks get out of the deal besides screwed?
Progressives ought to be screaming bloody murder at this phony compromise, but we also ought to have a constructive alternative on how we end the budget deficit. There are plenty of budget cuts we can live with: ending wasteful defense spending, take away subsidies to the big corporate farms, put a strong public option in health care reform, have the federal government negotiate drug prices, end the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. There are plenty of taxes we can raise that wouldn't soak the people who have been most hurt by the economy of the last decade, including a financial transactions tax on the big banking speculators, an end to the corporate tax loopholes and offshore tax avoidance, bringing taxes on the wealthy back to the level they were before the Reagan tax cuts.
1 Comments:
Did you read John Kline’s OpEd in the Rochester Post-Bulletin yesterday ? He stated that one complaint that he has heard is the lack of co-operation between the parties … and he then congratulated himself on how the Republicans and Democrats have worked together to pass the Defense budget …. What he didn’t state was that how Obama’s $548.9 billion Department of Defense FY2011 Budget become approved as a marked-up budget of $726 billion. Why wouldn’t they work together when it’s adding and not cutting.
But some are trying to rein in unnecessary spending. Tim Walz was on Tim Penny’s radio program on Friday discussing the previous night’s vote on whether to delete the $485 million for the GE-requested (and Bush/Obama Administration disapproved) alternate engine for the Joint Strike Fighter program. Fiscal Conservative Jeff Flake (R-AZ), Walz and a number of others voted against the expenditure … but the Republicans voted 116-57 to keep the funding … so the budget gets blown up …
Other prominent add-ons include more F-18 Hornets (that Boeing wanted), more ships, etc.
For more info, read this.
IMO, the Republicans will talk about increased national debt … blaming it on Obamacare (which hasn’t kicked in yet) while never acknowledging their run-away spending on Defense.
Post a Comment
<< Home