SMRs and AMRs

Wednesday, October 17, 2007

A view of Iraq from the guys who fight the war

"Still, our colonels and generals keep holding on to flawed concepts."
The Real Iraq We Knew

By 12 former Army captains
Washington Post

Today marks five years since the authorization of military force in Iraq, setting Operation Iraqi Freedom in motion. Five years on, the Iraq war is as undermanned and under-resourced as it was from the start. And, five years on, Iraq is in shambles.

As Army captains who served in Baghdad and beyond, we've seen the corruption and the sectarian division. We understand what it's like to be stretched too thin. And we know when it's time to get out.

What does Iraq look like on the ground? It's certainly far from being a modern, self-sustaining country. Many roads, bridges, schools and hospitals are in deplorable condition. Fewer people have access to drinking water or sewage systems than before the war. And Baghdad is averaging less than eight hours of electricity a day.

Iraq's institutional infrastructure, too, is sorely wanting. Even if the Iraqis wanted to work together and accept the national identity foisted upon them in 1920s, the ministries do not have enough trained administrators or technicians to coordinate themselves. At the local level, most communities are still controlled by the same autocratic sheiks that ruled under Saddam. There is no reliable postal system. No effective banking system. No registration system to monitor the population and its needs.

The inability to govern is exacerbated at all levels by widespread corruption. Transparency International ranks Iraq as one of the most corrupt countries in the world. And, indeed, many of us witnessed the exploitation of U.S. tax dollars by Iraqi officials and military officers. Sabotage and graft have had a particularly deleterious impact on Iraq's oil industry, which still fails to produce the revenue that Pentagon war planners hoped would pay for Iraq's reconstruction. Yet holding people accountable has proved difficult. The first commissioner of a panel charged with preventing and investigating corruption resigned last month, citing pressure from the government and threats on his life.

(More here.)

1 Comments:

Blogger Minnesota Central said...

Some may call these soldiers “phony” … which I suppose is the same for the seven servicemen who wrote an August a NYT Op-Ed piece or even retired Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez who called the U.S. mission in Iraq a "nightmare with no end in sight" , but what about the other side ? ? ? The Iraqi side.

Feisal Amin Istrabadi has dual citizenship (Iraq and America) and was the principal drafter of Iraq's interim constitution and Iraq’s deputy ambassador to the United Nations.

Like others who are now speaking out, Istrabadi acknowledged that he harbored doubts at the time but was powerless to speak out because he represented the government. “I publicly defended them because that was the government’s policy,” “Fundamentally, you have the Iraq state falling apart and an inability on the part of the political class to put it back together,” he said. When asked about the decisions to have elections, he thought they were not ready for them … but pushed by the Bush Administration … so why have them ??? … Simple, so “an American politician can stand up and say, ‘Look what we accomplished in Iraq.’ When, in fact, what we accomplished in Iraq over the last three years has been chaos and instability.”

Read the NBC News story here

9:36 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home