SMRs and AMRs

Tuesday, October 16, 2007

Retirement season hits GOP hard

In 2008, Republicans look certain to be defending more seats in Congress with less money than Democrats.
By Janet Hook and Theo Milonopoulos
Los Angeles Times

WASHINGTON — This is crunchtime for members of Congress who must decide whether to seek reelection next year or leave office, and so far Republicans seem to be lunging for the exits. While 16 GOP lawmakers have decided to throw in the towel on their Capitol Hill careers, only two Democrats so far have called it quits -- and they both are seeking higher office.

The disparity underscores the sharply different moods in the two parties: Democrats, still heady from winning control of Congress last year, are enjoying the fruits of power. Republicans, their party in disarray and reduced to minority status in the House and Senate, see more allure in retirement or private life.

"I don't like being in the minority," said Rep. Ray LaHood (R-Ill.), who was first elected in the 1994 GOP landslide and will retire after this term. "It's not that much fun, and the pros- pects for the future don't look that good."

The wave of retirements compounds the challenge facing the GOP in the 2008 congressional election, because the party is significantly trailing Democrats in fundraising. That means Republicans will apparently be defending more House and Senate seats with less money, and they will be fighting battles in places that otherwise might have been secure.

What is more, many of the Republicans choosing to retire are older, more pragmatic lawmakers, such as Rep. Ralph Regula of Ohio; moderates like Rep. Deborah Pryce of Ohio and Sen. John W. Warner of Virginia; and mavericks like Sen. Chuck Hagel of Nebraska. These departures reflect the generational and ideological changes that have pushed the Republican contingent in Congress steadily to the right over the last decade.

(Continued here.)

1 Comments:

Blogger Minnesota Central said...

This is a sad reflection on the lack of commitment to public service.

Many of these “retirees” could have adhered to term limits and left already, but decided to stay on as long as they had the power to influence legislation.
Remember when Tony Snow said he was abandoning the President because he could NOT live on $165k salary … well, how many of these Congressmen will find that (even with the revised ethics bill) that they can make more money (without the hassles from constituents) outside of Congress ? Many will join Fortune 500 Boards and become consultants. Soon they will find that they do not even have to be a registered lobbyist to make big money. Giving speeches worked great for Rudy G … John Edwards seemed to prosper after his Senate term was up. And with Congress's retirement programs, the taxpayers will continue to support them.

10:09 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home