SMRs and AMRs

Monday, July 02, 2007

Would you like some carbon monoxide with your steak?

Congressmen Demand Answers From Safeway, Meat Packers
By Jodi Seth, Committee on Energy and Commerce
June 26, 2007

Reps. John D. Dingell (Dem.-Michigan), Chairman of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and Bart Stupak (Dem.-Michigan), Chairman of the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, are demanding that Safeway Stores and three major meat packaging companies respond to concerns about the public health risks posed by meat treated with carbon monoxide.

In letters sent yesterday to Safeway Stores, Inc., Tyson Foods, Inc., Pactiv Corporation and Precept Foods LLC (Hormel Foods Corporation/Cargill Incorporated), Dingell and Stupak questioned the companies’ practice of packing fresh meat in carbon monoxide, which artificially colors the product and disguises spoilage. Safeway Stores, Inc. is the largest, and one of the few, grocery chains that sells meat packed in carbon monoxide.

“American consumers deserve to know that when they purchase food that looks fresh and safe, it actually is,” said Dingell. “We want to hear from Safeway and its meat suppliers about the precautions, warnings and other protections they have put in place to prevent consumers from unknowingly purchasing spoiled or contaminated foods.”

Carbon monoxide treated products find their way onto grocery store shelves through an FDA approval process called Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS). GRAS products are approved without pre-market review because, by FDA standards, they have proven to be sufficiently safe.

More than a year ago, Energy and Commerce Committee Democrats raised concerns about the dangers carbon monoxide packaging poses to the public health, particularly the elderly. In letters dated February 9, 2006, and March 30, 2006, they requested that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) remove products treated with carbon monoxide from markets until the safety of these products could be assessed. These requests were ignored.

(More here.)

Labels: ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home