SMRs and AMRs

Thursday, February 22, 2007

Iraq: It's not about oil, you say? Yeah, right...

Western companies will officially control Iraq’s oil soon
Aljazeera Magazine, 2/21/2007

“No one in Iraq knows about the new oil law”

By: Ahmed Abdullah

Nearly four years have passed since the U.S. sent its troops to “liberate Iraq” through an illegal war, described by most analysts and experts as well as most of Iraqis, as a hidden attempt by the Bush administration, which claimed that reasons for the war was the former Iraqi leader’s alleged link to Al Qaeda network and possession of Weapons of Mass Destruction, to lay hands on the country’s oil riches.

Today, the Iraqi government, under the control of the U.S., is considering a new oil law that would establish a framework for managing Iraq’s oil wealth, the third-largest oil reserves in the world.

Here Raed Jarrar, an Iraqi blogger and architect, who said he has obtained a copy of the new oil law, discusses the new legislation with Antonia Juhasz, author of "The Bush Agenda: Invading the World One Economy at a Time,” where she uncovers the economic gains of the U.S. occupation of Iraq.

(The rest is here. NOTE: Aljazeera Magazine is not affiliated with Al Jazeera TV.)

Labels: ,

2 Comments:

Blogger Minnesota Central said...

From Friday’s UK’s The Independent, explains not only how US and British oil companies plan to be involved in Iraqi oil, but also the Russians and Chinese :

“the US group ConocoPhillips has pulled off a clever arrangement. Lukoil negotiated with the regime of Saddam Hussein for rights to the giant undeveloped West Qurna field. ConocoPhillips has taken a 20 per cent equity stake in Lukoil - a deal approved by the Kremlin - and it has apparently negotiated a 50 per cent share in Lukoil's West Qurna interest. So the Russian personnel would take the risks but Americans would still benefit.”

http://news.independent.co.uk/business/analysis_and_features/article2296884.ece

2:14 PM  
Blogger Minnesota Central said...

Did you read Antonia Juhasz's editorial in today's NYTimes (She is cited above in your orginal post)?
Consider her comment "In March 2001, the National Energy Policy Development Group (better known as Vice President Dick Cheney’s energy task force), which included executives of America’s largest energy companies, recommended that the United States government support initiatives by Middle Eastern countries “to open up areas of their energy sectors to foreign investment.” and consider the Halliburton decision to move to Dubai.

Here are some other parts of her OpEd peice.
,,, the benefits of this excellent proposal are radically undercut by the law’s many other provisions — these allow much (if not most) of Iraq’s oil revenues to flow out of the country and into the pockets of international oil companies.

The foreign companies would not have to invest their earnings in the Iraqi economy, partner with Iraqi companies, hire Iraqi workers or share new technologies. They could even ride out Iraq’s current “instability” by signing contracts now, while the Iraqi government is at its weakest, and then wait at least two years before even setting foot in the country. The vast majority of Iraq’s oil would then be left underground for at least two years rather than being used for the country’s economic development.

Iraq’s five trade union federations, representing hundreds of thousands of workers, released a statement opposing the law and rejecting “the handing of control over oil to foreign companies, which would undermine the sovereignty of the state and the dignity of the Iraqi people.” They ask for more time, less pressure and a chance at the democracy they have been promised.

9:06 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home