SMRs and AMRs

Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Medicare savings do not come through subsidizing privatization

Understanding Medicare “Cuts”

Paul Krugman, NYT

Jackie Calmes has a very good piece about those Medicare "cuts" Romney promises to repeal. As she emphasizes, all of these involve reductions in payments to insurance companies and health providers, rather than reductions in patient benefits. So what are we talking about?

Sarah Kliff had a good summary. Most of the proposed savings come from reducing overpayments to Medicare Advantage and reducing reimbursement rates to hospitals.

What should you know about these changes?

Medicare Advantage is a 15-year failed experiment in privatization. Running Medicare through private insurance companies was supposed to save money through the magic of the marketplace; in reality, private insurers, with their extra overhead, have never been able to compete on a level playing field with conventional Medicare. But Congress refused to take no for an answer, and kept the program alive by paying the insurers substantially more than the costs per patient of regular Medicare. All the ACA does is end this overpayment.

(More here.)

1 Comments:

Blogger Patrick Dempsey said...

Applying The Krugman Rule, subsidizing privatization is exactly what is needed to ensure Medicare savings are realized.

We should embrace the Ryan plan forthwith if anyone under 55 wants to have any sort of Medicare program in the future.

4:09 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home