SMRs and AMRs

Thursday, November 03, 2011

Who Speaks for the Silent Majority?

By MATTHEW D. LASSITER
NYT

Ann Arbor, Mich.

AMERICAN politics might appear polarized along a red-blue divide, but the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street movements are claiming to do the same thing: defend the real majority against the powerful elites and vocal interest groups that control the political system. Conservatives in the Tea Party attack big government and rally behind the slogan “Silent Majority No More!” Progressives in Occupy Wall Street denounce big business and embrace the manifesto “We Are the 99 Percent.”

On both the right and the left, strategists want to mobilize the elusive group of voters that Richard M. Nixon first labeled the “great silent majority” during a speech about the Vietnam War on Nov. 3, 1969. With one rhetorical stroke, Nixon identified a new populist category that redefined how political groups strive for influence.

At the time, polls revealed that two-thirds of Americans hoped the conflict would end quickly but simultaneously opposed antiwar demonstrations. Nixon called for unity on the home front and asked patriotic Americans to speak out against efforts by a “vocal minority” to defeat the United States. Tens of thousands of letters from self-identified members of the silent majority poured into the White House.

Nixon’s conservative populism attempted to obscure the differences between working-class and affluent voters by portraying the silent majority as both heroes and victims of this tumultuous period. In the 1968 campaign, Nixon praised the “forgotten Americans, the nonshouters, the nondemonstrators” — hard-working, tax-paying Americans whose values were under siege by antiwar protesters, urban rioters, criminals and antipoverty liberals.

(More here.)

2 Comments:

Blogger Tom Koch said...

I wonder if bringing Nixon into the fray is an indication that Bush bashing is loosing traction? I would encourage Lassitor to review William Graham Sumner’s “The Forgotten Man”

7:43 AM  
Anonymous Marc Richter said...

Another point worthy of consideration from Nixon was his campaign's ability in 1968 to portray him as the candidate of "law & order" after the riots that broke out around the nation in 1968, culminating in Chicago at the democratic convention.

What will be interesting in the 2012 election will be whether the occupy wall street crowd will replicate the deeds of the protesting parents and grandparents and if a Republican candidate can capitalize on the desire by a silent majority for law and order if the OWS crowd continues to grow more violent.

You can't tell me history doesn't repeat itself.

11:34 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home