SMRs and AMRs

Wednesday, October 26, 2011

The War Against Climate Science Unravels

Kelly Rigg
HuffPost
Posted: 10/24/11 08:51 AM ET

The skeptic case against climate change is unraveling before our eyes like someone walking away from an old sweater, thread in hand.

For those who have ever put the skeptic arguments to the test, it has always been clear that their criticisms rarely stand up to even the most basic level of academic rigor. But last week's release of the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature (BEST) study delivered a decisive blow to the edifice of climate skepticism.

The key skeptic pillar, summarized by arch skeptic Anthony Watts, has always been this: "How do we know if global warming is a problem if we can't trust the temperature record?"

His 2009 study of US weather monitoring stations argued that many were located in areas where temperatures were likely to be higher than in surrounding areas, suggesting that estimates of warming were exaggerated. So the BEST study, partly funded by the climate denial industry, was undoubtedly meant to corroborate Watt's fundamental tenet.

(More here.)

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home