SMRs and AMRs

Thursday, March 31, 2011

NYT editorial: An Extraordinary Intrusion on Women’s Rights

Far too many states are putting new obstacles in the way of women seeking legal abortions. But South Dakota’s new law stands out for its intrusiveness and its abuse of women’s rights.

About half the states, including South Dakota, require women to wait 24 hours after an initial doctor’s visit before terminating a pregnancy. The South Dakota law, which takes effect on July 1, now extends that waiting period to three days, making it the nation’s longest.

As a practical matter, the 72-hour wait is likely to stretch to a week or more. With no local doctors willing to perform abortions, the sole provider of nonemergency abortions in the state, a Planned Parenthood clinic in Sioux Falls, flies in doctors from Minnesota once a week. The new law will further compound the hardship for low-income women who must travel long distances to reach the clinic and who will be forced to make several trips or arrange to stay away from home between appointments.

The new law’s intrusions don’t stop there. All women seeking abortions, including victims of rape and incest, will be forced first to attend a counseling session at one of the state’s crisis pregnancy centers. These are unregulated facilities run by private groups with the aim of discouraging abortions, typically by displaying graphic photos or with ideological or religious messages or medical misinformation about psychological or physical risks.

(Original here.)

2 Comments:

Blogger Tom said...

Yes, an intrusion into what is perceived as a woman’s right and, a major step forward for the rights of the unborn. “If abortion is not wrong than nothing is wrong.” As borrowed from Honest Abe

6:33 PM  
Blogger Tom said...

By the way, people are free to chose the state they live in and I think if one checks the records, liberal states are loosing population. Interesting.

6:34 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home