SMRs and AMRs

Saturday, January 22, 2011

Clarence Thomas failed to report wife's income, watchdog says

Virginia Thomas earned over $680,000 from conservative think tank the Heritage Foundation over 5 years, a group says. But the Supreme Court justice did not include it on financial disclosure forms.

By Kim Geiger, Washington Bureau
January 22, 2011
Reporting from Washington

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas failed to report his wife's income from a conservative think tank on financial disclosure forms for at least five years, the watchdog group Common Cause said Friday.

Between 2003 and 2007, Virginia Thomas, a longtime conservative activist, earned $686,589 from the Heritage Foundation, according to a Common Cause review of the foundation's IRS records. Thomas failed to note the income in his Supreme Court financial disclosure forms for those years, instead checking a box labeled "none" where "spousal noninvestment income" would be disclosed.

A Supreme Court spokesperson could not be reached for comment late Friday. But Virginia Thomas' employment by the Heritage Foundation was well known at the time.

Virginia Thomas also has been active in the group Liberty Central, an organization she founded to restore the "founding principles" of limited government and individual liberty.

(More here.)

1 Comments:

Blogger Minnesota Central said...

Huh … I thought that only government workers were highly paid ?

My complaint is that the Heritage Foundation is a charity … 501(c) … an educational foundation … at average annual salary that is over $137,000, doesn’t it make you wonder if they are over-compensating their employees … while the contributors take a tax deduction.

The story states that Justice Thomas did not report his wife’s income from 2003 to 2007 … since she has been employed by them earlier … her last publication was in 2000, was her salary listed on earlier filings ? Or is this a new requirement ?

FYI : The Heritage Foundation just issued a commentary on federal pay … its conclusion :
The federal pay system requires fundamental reform, starting with objective analysis from independent economists. Excessive salaries might be only a small part of the government's budgetary shortfall, but their existence implies government is not serious about fiscal belt-tightening.

I guess they don't have to worry about excessive salaries when they are a charity.

10:35 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home