SMRs and AMRs

Wednesday, December 30, 2009

Obama takes the heat Bush did not

By: Josh Gerstein
Politico.com
December 29, 2009

Eight years ago, a terrorist bomber’s attempt to blow up a transatlantic airliner was thwarted by a group of passengers, an incident that revealed some gaping holes in airline security just a few months after the attacks of Sept. 11. But it was six days before President George W. Bush, then on vacation, made any public remarks about the so-called “shoe bomber,” Richard Reid, and there were virtually no complaints from the press or any opposition Democrats that his response was sluggish or inadequate.

That stands in sharp contrast to the withering criticism President Barack Obama has received from Republicans and some in the press for his reaction to Friday’s incident on a Northwest Airlines flight heading for Detroit.

Democrats have seized on the disparity and are making it a centerpiece of their efforts to counter GOP attacks on the White House. “This hypocrisy demonstrates Republicans are playing politics with issues of national security and terrorism,” DNC spokesman Hari Sevugan said. “That they would use this incident as an opportunity to fan partisan flames…tells you all you need to know about how far the Republican party has fallen and how out of step with the American people they have become.”

The Democrats’ counterattack is aimed largely at two Republican congressmen who have been particularly critical of Obama, Reps. Pete Hoekstra (R-N.Y.) and Peter King (R-N.Y.). But neither GOP lawmaker will concede applying a double standard to Obama.

(More here.)

1 Comments:

Blogger Minnesota Central said...

I have a hunch that if Obama was in DC when the attack occurred that he would have made a comment that we need to “stay vigilant” and to give time for the investigative process to play out before assessing blame. I saw Napolitano on Sunday’s TV news programs and she was too docile … she is the one that is becoming the GOP’s “Brownie”.

By focusing on Obama’s reaction time, the real point is being missed.
Why did this occur ?
Simple .. Bush invaded Iraq. If Bush had stabilized Afghanistan and not ever ventured into Iraq, this person may never have been motivated to become radicalized.

While Peter King has been quick to criticize, he was the one that told Al-Qaeda that Amsterdam flights are not allowed to carry US Marshals … anyone complaining about that breach of operational plans ?

9:28 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home