Interrogation Views Spread With Help of Bush Aides
By JESS BRAVIN
Wall Street Journal
WASHINGTON -- Senior Bush administration officials made possible the spread of aggressive interrogation methods from Guantanamo to Afghanistan and Iraq, according to a report released Tuesday by the Senate Armed Services Committee.
Bush officials "solicited information on how to use aggressive techniques" and "redefined the law to create the appearance of their legality," concludes the report, which, according to committee chairman Carl Levin (D., Mich.), was approved without objection from Democrats or Republicans on the panel. The report says the Bush officials suppressed or ignored conflicting legal advice from senior military officers to ensure that practices would be available to interrogators.
The 232-page report, compiled after years of investigation by committee staff, was adopted in November, but it wasn't until Tuesday that the Defense Department approved the release of an unclassified version, Sen. Levin said.
[Jay Bybee (below) and John Yoo were Justice Department lawyers who wrote some of the key memos justifying the CIA's use of harsh interrogation tactics.] Associated Press
Jay Bybee (below) and John Yoo were Justice Department lawyers who wrote some key memos justifying the CIA's use of harsh interrogation tactics.
The report, focusing on Defense Department actions, adds to the picture of an administration scrambling after the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, to construct a "new paradigm" for dealing with enemy prisoners, in the words of former White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales, who later served as attorney general.
(More here.)
Wall Street Journal
WASHINGTON -- Senior Bush administration officials made possible the spread of aggressive interrogation methods from Guantanamo to Afghanistan and Iraq, according to a report released Tuesday by the Senate Armed Services Committee.
Bush officials "solicited information on how to use aggressive techniques" and "redefined the law to create the appearance of their legality," concludes the report, which, according to committee chairman Carl Levin (D., Mich.), was approved without objection from Democrats or Republicans on the panel. The report says the Bush officials suppressed or ignored conflicting legal advice from senior military officers to ensure that practices would be available to interrogators.
The 232-page report, compiled after years of investigation by committee staff, was adopted in November, but it wasn't until Tuesday that the Defense Department approved the release of an unclassified version, Sen. Levin said.
[Jay Bybee (below) and John Yoo were Justice Department lawyers who wrote some of the key memos justifying the CIA's use of harsh interrogation tactics.] Associated Press
Jay Bybee (below) and John Yoo were Justice Department lawyers who wrote some key memos justifying the CIA's use of harsh interrogation tactics.
The report, focusing on Defense Department actions, adds to the picture of an administration scrambling after the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, to construct a "new paradigm" for dealing with enemy prisoners, in the words of former White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales, who later served as attorney general.
(More here.)
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home