Occupation Plan for Iraq Faulted in Army History
By MICHAEL R. GORDON
NYT
WASHINGTON — Soon after American forces toppled Saddam Hussein in 2003, Gen. Tommy R. Franks surprised senior Army officers by revamping the Baghdad-based military command.
The decision reflected the assumption by General Franks, the top American commander for the Iraq invasion, that the major fighting was over. But according to an Army history that is to be made public on Monday, the move put the military effort in the hands of a short-staffed headquarters led by a newly promoted three-star general, and was made over the objections of the Army’s vice chief of staff.
“The move was sudden and caught most of the senior commanders in Iraq unaware,” states the history, which adds that the new headquarters “was not configured for the types of responsibilities it received.”
An aide to General Franks said that the former commander had covered Iraq decisions in his book [American Soldier], and General Franks told Army historians that it was the Pentagon’s responsibility to make sure the new Iraq headquarters was properly established.
The story of the American occupation of Iraq has been the subject of numerous books, studies and memoirs. But now the Army has waded into the highly charged debate with its own 696-page account: “On Point II: Transition to the New Campaign.”
(Continued here.)
NYT
WASHINGTON — Soon after American forces toppled Saddam Hussein in 2003, Gen. Tommy R. Franks surprised senior Army officers by revamping the Baghdad-based military command.
The decision reflected the assumption by General Franks, the top American commander for the Iraq invasion, that the major fighting was over. But according to an Army history that is to be made public on Monday, the move put the military effort in the hands of a short-staffed headquarters led by a newly promoted three-star general, and was made over the objections of the Army’s vice chief of staff.
“The move was sudden and caught most of the senior commanders in Iraq unaware,” states the history, which adds that the new headquarters “was not configured for the types of responsibilities it received.”
An aide to General Franks said that the former commander had covered Iraq decisions in his book [American Soldier], and General Franks told Army historians that it was the Pentagon’s responsibility to make sure the new Iraq headquarters was properly established.
The story of the American occupation of Iraq has been the subject of numerous books, studies and memoirs. But now the Army has waded into the highly charged debate with its own 696-page account: “On Point II: Transition to the New Campaign.”
(Continued here.)
Powered by Blogger
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home