SMRs and AMRs

Sunday, January 20, 2008

In rural Midwest, photo/headline combo elicits strong response


What would Jesus say?

by Leigh Pomeroy

Several large billboards saying, simply, "Jesus", adorn Highways 22 and 169 heading toward the small college town of St. Peter, Minnesota, including one in North Mankato, some 12 miles south of St. Peter (pictured at left). Needless to say, few passersby miss them, and the billboards no doubt elicit a wide range of private, inside-the-vehicle comments ranging from "Amen" to "I think it's disrespectful" (an actual comment I've heard) to something of a more irreverent variety designed to elicit chuckles or even guffaws.

But now those comments have spilled into the public arena what with the unwitting — so claims Mankato Free Press editor Joe Spear — juxtaposition of the photo printed on the front page of the newspaper next to the headline:
North Mankato cracks down on ‘eyesores’
The ensuing article was of the innocuous local news sort, throwing in junk cars and ornate landscaping along with the now ubiquitous billboards. But that, of course, is not what had some Mankato Free Press readers frothing at the mouth, expressed via irate phone calls, and the keyboard, expressed via a larger-than-average barrage of letters to the editor.

Here's a smattering of some of the nicer responses:
I’ve seen my share of bad reporting, but the front-page headline and picture on Monday was, in my opinion, one of the most offensive in recent memory.

I was deeply offended by the screaming headline and accompanying photo in Monday’s edition of The Free Press.

We were very disappointed and upset that you would not only select that particular shot, but that you put it on the upper half of the front page so it would show in all newspaper racks. How sad that you choose to do that in our community.

Concerning the article about removing eyesores along the highway, Jesus is a sight for sore eyes.
On the other hand, one reader bravely chose to support the paper's controversial photo/headline placement:
I was sure The Free Press would get slammed in the editorials about its Jan. 14 front-page picture of the billboard along Highway 22. That headline made me smile and the letter to the editor in Thursday’s paper made me laugh out loud. I thought it was a perfect choice for a picture — a better representation of visual clutter couldn’t have been selected.
Judging from responses I've received (some anonymous) to less controversial positions I've put forward in the Mankato Free Press and on this blog, no doubt the author of the above piece will be hearing an earful from some of our more vociferous Christians in the community.

For his part, as I indicated above, Free Press Editor Spear said the juxtaposition of the photo and the headline was unintentional. Under the headline "Jesus: Forgive us our trespasses," he wrote, "It’s one of those things that happens when people put together 50,000 words and dozens of photographs a day and must, I say must, have it done by midnight, without exception." (His commentary is currently available online only to subscribers.)

Okay, it was all a mistake. So there.

Meanwhile, life goes on. Hillary, McCain, Obama, Mitt, Huckabee, Edwards, Rudy... who cares? Global warming, end of oil, financial market meltdowns... who cares? Subprime mortgage debacle, rising unemployment, soaring personal debt... who cares? Iraq war, trillion dollar deficits, Medicare and Social Security insolvency... who cares?

Let's get it straight: Defending the honor of a billboard that says "Jesus" in eight-foot-high letters is more important than, well, gosh, just about anything else.

Labels: , ,

2 Comments:

Blogger Patrick Dempsey said...

I am not sure whose motivations you are judging - the Free Press Editors or the Readers who responded negatively to the photo/headline.

It is not your place to determine what people should feel passion or outrage about. You, no doubt, feel passionately about global warming, Iraq, Medicare, Medicade, Social Security, etc..., but can we dispense with the ad hominem attacks in your commentary against Christians who feel just as passionate about the issue of the photo/headline as you do about the issues you feel are important?

2:59 PM  
Blogger feral_artist said...

Leigh, I couldn't agree with you more. Our fellow Americans become so outrageously offended about anything and everything that common sense is usually the first thing abandoned in any discourse. Last year at work I was actually charged with sexual harassment for making an innocuous quip about the anti-harassment video we were made to watch. The video was so dumbed down and the examples of harassment shown so obvious that my 2 year-old nephew with Down's Syndrome could've seen that kind of behavior was inappropriate. And anyone who knows me knows that I'm the last person to harass, let alone sexually harass, ANYONE.

To the poster patrick dempsey, I'd like to remind you of the Constitution which expressly permits freedom of speech, unless it's deemed libelous. None of Leigh's comments are even close to libel. He used no derogatory terms nor did he lower himself to name calling. He was pointing out what should be obvious to everyone: There are way more important issues facing the U.S. today without flying off at the handle about an honest mistake. Didn't Jesus say 'turn the other cheek?' And what about forgiveness? I know all about publishing and meeting deadlines, and no matter how much you double-check your work, something usually slips under the radar.

People, we need a reality check. There's nothing wrong with being passionate, but when your passion turns to blind rage everyone involved suffers, and the truth is usually lost in translation. Here's where we can learn from most of Europe. Americans have become way too uptight, treating everyone as an attacker. If common sense came in pill/vaccine form there should be mass innoculations immediately.

3:28 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home