SMRs and AMRs

Monday, December 17, 2007

Bush Administration Refuses to Turn Over Information to Court on Tape Destruction; Judge Told Not to 'Interfere'

Jonathan Turley

The Bush Administration waited to late Friday night to tell a federal judge that it would not release information on its own possible obstruction of justice in his court.

U.S. District Judge Henry H. Kennedy has demanded information about the tapes for obvious reasons. Like other courts, he was given false information by the Bush Administration on the existence of such evidence. Indeed, in June 2005, Kennedy ordered the Administration to safeguard “all evidence and information regarding the torture, mistreatment, and abuse of detainees now at the United States Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay.” Five months later, the CIA destroyed the interrogation videos.

The Bush Administration is trying alternative rationales for refusing to turn over evidence of its own obstruction. First, it is arguing that since Abu Zubaydah and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri - were technically not at the Guantanamo military prison in Cuba at the time — they fell outside of the order.

Acting Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey S. Bucholtz further told the court that any inquiry on its part would be unwelcomed “interference” with its own investigation into its own misconduct. That’s right. Here is how the argument goes: First, the Bush Administration tell Congress and courts that no such evidence exists. Second, while members of Congress, judges, and defense attorneys are demanding the evidence, the Bush Administration methodically gathers every copy and destroys the evidence. Third, while people uniformly demand a special prosecutor, the Justice Department insists that it will investigate itself. Fourth, almost immediately upon rejecting a special prosecutor, the Justice Department then claims its own investigation of its own misconduct as an excuse not to turn over any evidence of its misconduct to courts. Of course, it waits until a late Friday when all such scandalous acts are committed to avoid news coverage.

I have seen more reputable conduct from mob attorneys.

(Continued here.)

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home