Global warming lawsuit dismissed
A judge denies the state's bid for damages from carmakers.
By Marc Lifsher
Los Angeles Times
California's attempt to collect billions of dollars in damages by accusing automakers of creating a global warming-related "nuisance" was dismissed Monday by a federal judge in San Francisco.
The courts aren't set up to deal with climate change and other "political questions" with international reach, U.S. District Court Judge Martin J. Jenkins said. That task belongs to Congress and the executive branch of the government, he said.
The suit, originally filed a year ago by former Atty. Gen. Bill Lockyer, claimed that emissions of carbon dioxide and other so-called greenhouse gases from automobile tailpipes cause environmental damage. It cited as examples melting Sierra snowpacks, prolonged droughts and dying forests.
Car makers denied that their products could be characterized as nuisances under California and federal law. "Our bottom-line point is that global warming presents exceedingly complex policy issues that must be addressed at the national and international levels by Congress and the president, not through lawsuits seeking damages in the federal courts," said Ted Boutrous, lead attorney for the auto companies.
The defendants in the case included General Motors Corp., Toyota Motor North America Inc., Ford Motor Co., American Honda Motor Co., DaimlerChrysler Corp. and Nissan North America Inc.
(Continued here.)
By Marc Lifsher
Los Angeles Times
California's attempt to collect billions of dollars in damages by accusing automakers of creating a global warming-related "nuisance" was dismissed Monday by a federal judge in San Francisco.
The courts aren't set up to deal with climate change and other "political questions" with international reach, U.S. District Court Judge Martin J. Jenkins said. That task belongs to Congress and the executive branch of the government, he said.
The suit, originally filed a year ago by former Atty. Gen. Bill Lockyer, claimed that emissions of carbon dioxide and other so-called greenhouse gases from automobile tailpipes cause environmental damage. It cited as examples melting Sierra snowpacks, prolonged droughts and dying forests.
Car makers denied that their products could be characterized as nuisances under California and federal law. "Our bottom-line point is that global warming presents exceedingly complex policy issues that must be addressed at the national and international levels by Congress and the president, not through lawsuits seeking damages in the federal courts," said Ted Boutrous, lead attorney for the auto companies.
The defendants in the case included General Motors Corp., Toyota Motor North America Inc., Ford Motor Co., American Honda Motor Co., DaimlerChrysler Corp. and Nissan North America Inc.
(Continued here.)
Powered by Blogger
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home