There's a Nightmare in My Closet
And it's called TAXES!
by Leigh Pomeroy
One of my kids' favorite books when they were small was Mercer Mayer's "There's a Nightmare in My Closet." I think everyone knows the story:
There's a little boy who believes a monster lives in his closet. As it turns out, the monster, who is big and ugly and creepy, is just as afraid of the little boy as the boy is of him. They finally realize that they have a common bond and become friends. The end.
Many Minnesota Republicans insist there is a nightmare in their closet... and it's called TAXES! Taxes can be big and ugly and creepy if you perceive them to be that way, or they can become your friend if you respect them and utilize what they have to offer.
Generally speaking, higher taxes go with higher standards of living and more egalitarian societies. The Scandinavian countries are a good example. Minnesota is another good example. The quality of life in Minnesota is one of the highest in the nation. It is also a relatively high tax state.
Put simply, taxes are a shared way in which society pays for common properties, goods and services that everyone uses. Examples include schools, parks, roads, police and fire protection, and public defense (in the case of a nation). Taxes also help pay for health care, food, housing and business incentives.
Indeed, taxes are not to be feared but to be utilized.
The logic of treating taxes as if they are a nightmare hiding in a closet is beyond me, unless, of course, it is done for purely political reasons. In that case, treating taxes as if they were a big and ugly and creepy monster makes perfect sense if you put your own political agenda, personal opportunities and personal wealth above everyone else's. To me that's called selfishness — but I guess I'm old fashioned.
That said, I will be the first to acknowledge that not all tax systems are optimal. Complex tax codes create nightmarish administration costs and encourage tax cheating. Unfair tax systems stratify society and also encourage cheating. The best tax codes are the most simple and egalitarian.
Rather than be fearful of the monster in our closet we need to embrace him and make use of his talents. Heck, he can help us move our heavy bed and help us clean underneath it. He can lift us onto his shoulders and give us a ride around our bedroom. He can read books with us, like "Where the Wild Things Are." He can play catch with us, or even a good game of Scrabble. He can even scare away robbers that come creeping around late at night.
In other words, like in the Mercer Mayer book, the nightmare can be our friend. Or he can remain the terrible nightmare behind the closet door forever to be feared.
For many of Minnesota's Republican legislators, and for its governor, this is their choice. Fear or friendship? Selfishness or sharing? Which of these make the most sense?
by Leigh Pomeroy
One of my kids' favorite books when they were small was Mercer Mayer's "There's a Nightmare in My Closet." I think everyone knows the story:
There's a little boy who believes a monster lives in his closet. As it turns out, the monster, who is big and ugly and creepy, is just as afraid of the little boy as the boy is of him. They finally realize that they have a common bond and become friends. The end.
Many Minnesota Republicans insist there is a nightmare in their closet... and it's called TAXES! Taxes can be big and ugly and creepy if you perceive them to be that way, or they can become your friend if you respect them and utilize what they have to offer.
Generally speaking, higher taxes go with higher standards of living and more egalitarian societies. The Scandinavian countries are a good example. Minnesota is another good example. The quality of life in Minnesota is one of the highest in the nation. It is also a relatively high tax state.
Put simply, taxes are a shared way in which society pays for common properties, goods and services that everyone uses. Examples include schools, parks, roads, police and fire protection, and public defense (in the case of a nation). Taxes also help pay for health care, food, housing and business incentives.
Indeed, taxes are not to be feared but to be utilized.
The logic of treating taxes as if they are a nightmare hiding in a closet is beyond me, unless, of course, it is done for purely political reasons. In that case, treating taxes as if they were a big and ugly and creepy monster makes perfect sense if you put your own political agenda, personal opportunities and personal wealth above everyone else's. To me that's called selfishness — but I guess I'm old fashioned.
That said, I will be the first to acknowledge that not all tax systems are optimal. Complex tax codes create nightmarish administration costs and encourage tax cheating. Unfair tax systems stratify society and also encourage cheating. The best tax codes are the most simple and egalitarian.
Rather than be fearful of the monster in our closet we need to embrace him and make use of his talents. Heck, he can help us move our heavy bed and help us clean underneath it. He can lift us onto his shoulders and give us a ride around our bedroom. He can read books with us, like "Where the Wild Things Are." He can play catch with us, or even a good game of Scrabble. He can even scare away robbers that come creeping around late at night.
In other words, like in the Mercer Mayer book, the nightmare can be our friend. Or he can remain the terrible nightmare behind the closet door forever to be feared.
For many of Minnesota's Republican legislators, and for its governor, this is their choice. Fear or friendship? Selfishness or sharing? Which of these make the most sense?
2 Comments:
Quality of life comes from quality people, a responsible society and the practice of Liberty... not taxation. I choose not to become dependent on the State for my happiness because I know I can do better. Those in power, these days, resent and discourage that type of individualism(except when it comes to taxing my meager wealth) "Those who rob Peter to pay Paul will always have the support of Paul." Don't get me wrong, taxes are an important and necessary part of our capitalistic model of goverment. The problem starts when taxes become a tool for those collecting them to keep power & wealth while the desired results of the unquenchable thrist for revenue become fewer to non-exsistent(i.e. public education). The thing that's missing from almost every bureacracy is the requirement for a "return on investment" before more money can be allocated. Promoting increased taxation as the only solution to societies needs and problems is truly disengenous to intelligent people. That is where the real selfishness lies. Claiming publicly to help others with increased government while fundraising with fear and threat. The government can't and shoulden't be a parent, friend or a nanny. And it certainly can't defend our home. That's why the Founding Fathers gave us the 2nd Amendment. I believe real and effective chartity starts at home. To some that makes me "selfish," to most that is what truely being "old fashioned" is all about.
I couldn’t let this one pass. Every time I start to think that I am a centrist, a liberal puts together a rant such as “The Nightmare in My Closet” that help me realize that I am far from the ‘left.’ Why does the liberal view of sharing seem to always end up with less money left in the hands of private individuals?
In the spirit of The Voice of Truth, what would be wrong with presenting a more balance view? Perhaps including historical information such as the following would help us make an intelligent decision.
• The 1990-91 to 2005 MN state general fund budget has outpaced inflation by 55%? Why? Can we find a more efficient ways to provide government services?
• State spending came close to doubling in the last decade, significantly outpacing general population growth. Why? Is this a desired trend?
Shouldn’t The Voice of the Truth include historical data instead of warm fuzzies that leave the uninformed believing our state budget has been drastically reduced when in fact, the opposite is true?
I encourage everyone to measure success by the amount of liberty and freedom we experience in this great state and country instead of the degree of government expansion.
I do not fear taxes. I fear those who blindly call for larger and larger government.
Post a Comment
<< Home