SMRs and AMRs

Saturday, January 13, 2007

House GOP Shows Its Fractiousness In the Minority

By Jonathan Weisman
Washington Post

House Republican leaders, who confidently predicted they would drive a wedge through the new Democratic majority, have found their own party splintering, with Republican lawmakers siding with Democrats in droves on the House's opening legislative blitz.

Freed from the pressures of being the majority and from the heavy hand of former leaders including retired representative Tom DeLay (R-Tex.), many back-bench Republicans are showing themselves to be more moderate than their conservative leadership and increasingly mindful of shifting voter sentiment. The closest vote last week -- Friday's push to require the federal government to negotiate lower drug prices for Medicare -- pulled 24 Republicans. The Democrats' homeland security bill attracted 68 Republicans, the minimum wage increase 82.

"You're freer to vote your conscience," said Rep. Jo Anne Emerson (R-Mo.), who received an 88 percent voting record from the American Conservative Union in 2005 but has so far sided with Democrats on new budget rules, Medicare prescription-drug negotiations, raising the minimum wage and funding stem cell research. "Or, really, I feel free to represent my constituents exactly as they want me to be."

"Times have changed. I don't want to be someone who they say is too stubborn to change too," said Rep. Rodney Alexander (R-La.), whose 92 percent conservative rating did not stop him from voting with Democrats on the homeland security and minimum-wage bills.

After their stinging defeat in November, Republican leaders in the House had gamely promised to draft procedural motions and parliamentary gambits that they said would split the new majority. With so many new Democrats hailing from moderate-to-conservative districts, even some Democrats saw the pledge as plausible.

(The rest is here.)

1 Comments:

Blogger Minnesota Central said...

If Roy Blunt notes that Democrats are passing “issues that poll at 80, 90 percent” -- why do Republicans vote against legislation that Americans clearly want?

I was surprised that there were not more Republicans that should have supported negotiating drug prices.

The Senate bill will probably get at least 58 votes in favor which is up from a 54-44 margin last year which included Republicans Collins, Graham, Hutchinson, McCain, Murkowski, Shelby, Smith, Snowe, Spector, and Stevens. Our boy, Norm Coleman still has not seen the light despite the how issued help separate Klobuchar and Kennedy. With Bush threatening a veto, voters need to put a lot of heat on Coleman to change his mind.

I have two commentaries on this subject on my blog.

3:23 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home